ACU Approved ID Tags
Printed From: Trackday Riders
Category: TDR ADVERTISER
Forum Name: Armydogtags
Forum Description: Armydogtags supply American-style dog tags, embossed with your choice of message
URL: http://www.trackdayriders.co.uk/tdr/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=44888
Printed Date: 27 March 2026 at 05:30
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.10 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: ACU Approved ID Tags
Posted By: armydogtags
Subject: ACU Approved ID Tags
Date Posted: 17 March 2014 at 11:23
|
Our tags have just been approved by the ACU for use by licence holders under standing regulation 14.3 which requires all road race competitors to wear approved ID tags when practising or racing. Historically the regs. stated you needed an ID 'disk' which basically meant a trip to the local pet shop to have a pet tag engraved. We now have a specific tag set for ACU licence holders for sale on our website: http://www.armydogtags.co.uk/acu-approved-id-tags - http://www.armydogtags.co.uk/acu-approved-id-tags All competitor's tags will now be made in the same consistent way making life easier for scrutineers and competitors alike. As a bonus they look good as well! Like all our sets the stainless steel tag is personalised with high quality embossing. The chain is aluminium which means they meet the regs from the point of view of posing a strangle hazard (the stainless steel chains are stronger). The reg require you to have your first name, surname and date of birth on them. ------------- http://www.armydogtags.co.uk"> 
|
Replies:
Posted By: SteveO916
Date Posted: 17 March 2014 at 12:14
|
does that mean that your previous ones weren't ok for racing?? i just bought a set thinking they'd be ok and sent the link to my team mate who may have bought some too! phoned the office and sorted now as they hadn't left yet..phew!  ------------- cheers, SteveO |
Posted By: armydogtags
Date Posted: 17 March 2014 at 13:14
No worries, we've included some aluminium chains as well to give you a choice. ------------- http://www.armydogtags.co.uk">
|
SteveO916 wrote: